From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:29:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:28:49 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:40326 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:28:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:28:28 -0600 Message-Id: <200108071728.f77HSSj05556@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: arjanv@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] one of $BIGNUM devfs races In-Reply-To: <3B7024EE.D58E6BF@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200108070517.f775HEw30547@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <200108071709.f77H9GD05198@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <3B7024EE.D58E6BF@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven writes: > Richard Gooch wrote: > > > Finally, a spinlock is less code (0) and faster on UP. > > Ehm not if you require protection against IRQ events...... Obviously. But I don't, in this case. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca