On Aug 13 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> VIA has some chipset bugs, Matrox G400 cards seem to abuse the PCI spec for 
> benchmarketing dirties.

	If I had to purchase a motherboard and graphics card for a
	desktop that were running Linux, which ones should I be
	buying? Are AMD's chipsets better than those made by VIA? And
	what about ATI's cards?

	Of course, making business with an open source-friendly is a
	requirement that I've beeing making for, say, 2 or 3 years.


	[]s, Roger...

P.S.: I have an Asus A7V/VIA KT133 boarch here with a Matrox G400 card
and I wish the performance were better (especially when I'm playing a
DVD). At least, when I'm using the Promise IDE interface and ignore
the IDE interface supplied by the southbridge, Linux feels faster.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogério Brito - rbrito@ime.usp.br - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=