From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:42:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:42:38 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:32896 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:42:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010816.164027.85686335.davem@redhat.com> To: aia21@cam.ac.uk Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, phillips@bonn-fries.net, tpepper@vato.org, f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010817002825.00b1e4e0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010816230719Z16545-1231+1256@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20010817002825.00b1e4e0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Anton Altaparmakov Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:35:02 +0100 Otherwise I would submit a patch to switch NTFS. I don't like this 3 arg construct... Linus will reject every such patch, and I have grepping scripts that will detect crap like this entering the tree in case he misses something. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com