From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:52:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:51:53 -0400 Received: from customers.imt.ru ([212.16.0.33]:18461 "HELO smtp.direct.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:51:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20010820064814.A704@saw.sw.com.sg> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:48:14 -0700 From: Andrey Savochkin To: Szabolcs Szakacsits Cc: Ivan Kalvatchev , kernelbug , Alan Cox Subject: Re: DoS tmpfs,ramfs, malloc, saga continues In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from "Szabolcs Szakacsits" on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 05:20:09PM Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 05:20:09PM +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > usage of a system well but not your case. The more complex answer is to > > provide the option for very precise group based resource accounting (aka > > the beancounter patch). That is for those who want to pay the probable 2% > > or so system penalty for being able to precisely manage a system resource > > set. With the beancounter infrastructure you can then get to the point where > > It's not ready for use. It was touched last time about one year ago for > 2.4.0-test7. I just can't spare time now to maintain the patch properly and make a port for each kernel release. When 2.5 is started, I've promised myself to put other things aside and work on the patch to have it in the mainstream. Andrey