From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:19:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:18:51 -0400 Received: from relay01.cablecom.net ([62.2.33.101]:16143 "EHLO relay01.cablecom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:18:48 -0400 Message-Id: <200108211618.f7LGIxk06055@mail.swissonline.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Christian Widmer Reply-To: cwidmer@iiic.ethz.ch To: Kristian , Alan Cox Subject: Re: massive filesystem corruption with 2.4.9 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:18:52 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3B8285A9.8030306@korseby.net> In-Reply-To: <3B8285A9.8030306@korseby.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > If your disk is in UDMA33/66 mode you can pretty rule the > > disk out as the data is protected i think this should be with the promise driver. > > If you have a VIA chipset, especially if there is an SB Live! in the > > machine then that may be the cause (fixes in 2.4.8-ac, should be a fix > > in 2.4.9 but Linus tree also applies another bogus change but which > > should be harmless) it was an intel LX chipset that it is a memory problem i also don't belive. that ram work for over 2 year with no errors found with memtest (memtset86, intels memtest) compiling seveal times xfree86 and an many many times several kernels. and i never had any problems. until i tried the first time a 2.4.x kernel on the fileserver (that was 2.4.6). so i moved the fileserver back to 2.2.19.