From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 07:48:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 07:47:51 -0400 Received: from thunderchild.ikk.sztaki.hu ([193.225.87.24]:54533 "HELO thunderchild.ikk.sztaki.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 07:47:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:47:57 +0200 From: Gergely Madarasz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: vm problems Message-ID: <20010829134757.A6202@thunderchild.ikk.sztaki.hu> In-Reply-To: <20010829131419.Z6202@thunderchild.ikk.sztaki.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20010829131419.Z6202@thunderchild.ikk.sztaki.hu>; from gorgo@thunderchild.debian.net on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:14:19PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:14:19PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote: > Hello, > > I get hundreds of this error message: > > __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed. > > The machine is an IBM x250 with 4G ram, the kernel is vanilla 2.4.9 and > 2.4.9-ac3, no swap, running bonnie++. When the memory fills up with cache, > I start receiving the error message. actually I thought I was running 2.4.9-ac3, but no, and I see the message is commented out in 2.4.9-ac3. Does this mean that it doesn't mean anything serious? Some of my processes were stuck in uninterruptible sleep, I couldn't even shutdown correctly, so there are some problems. -- Madarasz Gergely gorgo@thunderchild.debian.net gorgo@linux.rulez.org It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry. Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni. HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/