From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:44:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:44:08 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48343 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:43:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:56:27 +0200 From: Stefan Fleiter To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Diet /sbin/hotplug package released Message-ID: <20010830225627.A11646@shuttle.mothership.home.dhs.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010830124700.A3694@shuttle.mothership.home.dhs.org> <3117682009.999188508@[10.132.112.53]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3117682009.999188508@[10.132.112.53]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alex! On Thu, 30 Aug 2001 Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: >> Does it really make any sense to optimize for size and at the same time >> force the user to install a bash compatible shell? > No, that's why diet /sbin/hotplug didn't require any shell (as I understood > it), whereas the normal hotplug suite does. Oh. That really makes sense... Stefan, a bit ashamed...