From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S271708AbRIEF4v>; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:56:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S271712AbRIEF4l>; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:56:41 -0400
Received: from vitelus.com ([64.81.243.207]:784 "EHLO vitelus.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S271708AbRIEF42>;
	Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:56:28 -0400
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:56:38 -0700
From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac6
Message-ID: <20010904225638.B9241@vitelus.com>
In-Reply-To: <17870.999661846@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> <NOEJJDACGOHCKNCOGFOMOEBEDLAA.davids@webmaster.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NOEJJDACGOHCKNCOGFOMOEBEDLAA.davids@webmaster.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:16:15PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> 	Yes, but even if the module is GPL'd, the module could still cost $1,000
> and you're not entitled to the source if you didn't buy the module. If what
> you want is "source code is available to the general public", then that can
> be true or false for both GPL'd and non-GPL'd modules.

WTF.

You understand that the GPL would allow the reporter to include the
module source, right? It also doesn't really matter if it doesn't come
with source because someone using the binary has a legal right to ask
for source.