linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: antirez <antirez@invece.org>
To: Ingo Rohloff <rohloff@in.tum.de>
Cc: epic@scyld.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: epic100.c, gcc-2.95.2 compiler bug!
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:13:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010907161323.B31574@blu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010903130404.B1064@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20010907160159.C621@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20010907160315.D621@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010907160315.D621@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>; from rohloff@in.tum.de on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:03:15PM +0200

On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Ingo Rohloff wrote:
> BEWARE: DON'T USE gcc-2.95.2!
> I compiled the linux-2.4.9 version with gcc-2.95.2.
> And I can _definitely_ confirm that epic100.c triggers a compiler
> bug. (I have the erronous assembler code on my harddisk if anyone is
> interested.)

The following seems a gcc 3.0 bug, not sure it was fixed in gcc 3.01.

See the assembly generated with -O3 for the following code:

--------------------------------------------------------------
inline static long QInt(double inval)
{
        long *l;
        char *c = (char*) &inval;
        inval = 68719476991.99;

        l = (long*) (c+2);
        return *l;
}

int main(void)
{
        printf("%lu\n", QInt(OFFENDING_VALUE));
        return 0;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------

the above function is compiled as:

        .file   "test2.c"
        .section        .rodata
.LC0:
        .string "%lu\n"
        .text
        .align 16
.globl main
        .type   main,@function
main:
        pushl   %ebp
        movl    %esp, %ebp
        subl    $48, %esp
*       movl    $16776561, -32(%ebp)
*       movl    -30(%ebp), %eax
*       movl    $1110441984, -28(%ebp)
        pushl   %eax
        pushl   $.LC0
        call    printf
        addl    $16, %esp
        movl    %ebp, %esp
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        popl    %ebp
        ret
.Lfe1:
        .size   main,.Lfe1-main
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 3.0"

Note the line I marked with "*".
The double var is 8 byte, it is loaded
moving two 32 bit words in the -32 and -28 offset.
Unfortunatelly with -O3 the "*l" value get
computed between the two 'movl', and not after
the second movl.

This code is really unsane anyway but this seems
a clear gcc 3.0 bug.

I hope that the gcc folks here may report the
problem if not already known.

I didn't tested it but maybe the same problem
exists with other 8 byte types like 'long long'.

regards,
antirez

  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-07 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-03 11:04 epic100.c, SMC EtherPower II, SMC83c170/175 "EPIC" Ingo Rohloff
2001-09-07 14:01 ` Ingo Rohloff
2001-09-07 14:03   ` epic100.c, gcc-2.95.2 compiler bug! Ingo Rohloff
2001-09-07 14:13     ` antirez [this message]
2001-09-07 14:26       ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010907161323.B31574@blu \
    --to=antirez@invece.org \
    --cc=epic@scyld.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rohloff@in.tum.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).