From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:39:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:39:25 -0400 Received: from nbd.it.uc3m.es ([163.117.139.192]:16388 "EHLO nbd.it.uc3m.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:39:05 -0400 From: "Peter T. Breuer" Message-Id: <200109071739.TAA31281@nbd.it.uc3m.es> Subject: Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: "from Bill Pringlemeir at Sep 7, 2001 12:14:58 pm" To: Bill Pringlemeir Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 19:39:20 +0200 (CEST) CC: linux kernel X-Anonymously-To: Reply-To: ptb@it.uc3m.es X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL89 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Bill Pringlemeir wrote:" > I think that names like __reserved aren't suppose to be used and so a > "double underbar" was used instead of a single one. That is what I > meant anyways. I suppose that is another somewhat murky issue ;-) If I thought hard, I think I could generate a file and line -specific name. Peter