From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:38:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:37:53 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:35077 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:37:49 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: John Ripley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: COW fs (Re: Editing-in-place of a large file) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 04:43:53 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: VDA In-Reply-To: <20010902152137.L23180@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <3B9B80E2.C9D5B947@riohome.com> <3B9B9917.DA1CC12F@riohome.com> In-Reply-To: <3B9B9917.DA1CC12F@riohome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010910023641Z16066-26183+701@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On September 9, 2001 06:30 pm, John Ripley wrote: > Interesting results for the swap partitions. Probably full of zeros. It doesn't make a lot of sense to spend 30-35% of your swap bandwidth swapping zeros in and out, does it? -- Daniel