From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:39:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:38:50 -0400 Received: from 63-151-64-156.hsacorp.net ([63.151.64.156]:59653 "EHLO boojiboy.eorbit.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:38:35 -0400 From: chris@boojiboy.eorbit.net Message-Id: <200109130135.SAA23309@boojiboy.eorbit.net> Subject: Re: 2.4.9-ac9 APM w/Compaq 16xx laptop... To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200109130124.SAA22845@boojiboy.eorbit.net> from "chris@boojiboy.eorbit.net" at Sep 12, 2001 06:24:18 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > With 2.4.9-ac9 'shutdown -r' does not work. The > halt '-h' flag does work. '-r' hangs at "Restarting System." > Here is the pertinent dmesg stuff: > > Compaq 12XL125 machine detected. Enabling interrupts during APM calls. Another thing is this ID 'Compaq 12XL125'. This another model of laptop. The my Compaq Presario 1685 is another beast altogether. What are the consequence of this mis-detection? --Chris