From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:05:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:05:46 -0400 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:23302 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:05:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:06:03 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lazy umount (1/4) Message-ID: <20010917120603.B13815@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010915083236.A9271@bessie.localdomain> <20010915135118.A24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010915135118.A24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Either way, you'd have a system you can't reboot without hardware reset if > you have a process stuck in D state on a rw FS. That is EVIL, so eventually, the umount must succeed at all costs. -- Matthias Andree "Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin