From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 01:59:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 01:59:26 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:20024 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 01:59:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:59:27 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 Message-ID: <20010918075927.I698@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010918073248.G698@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from marcelo@conectiva.com.br on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:14:36AM -0300 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:14:36AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Note that in 2.4 we scan pte's even if there is no free pages > shortage, while in 2.2 we only scan pte's if there is a free page > shortage. That was most certainly a problem which is now fixed. Mainly the preallication of swap was a waste. But I think there was a kind of physical (not pte) overaging too that forbidden the vm to react properly. I believe when the storm of swap_out startups it won't matter any longer what we aged and whatever pte scanning we did previously. At least with the current swap_out. Andrea