From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:14:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:14:30 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:19411 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:14:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:15:55 -0600 Message-Id: <200109192215.f8JMFtQ26168@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alexander Viro Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010919225505.P720@athlon.random> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro writes: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > (infact I never had a single report), but well we'll verify that in > > > > > > Richard, is that you? What had you done with real Andrea? > > > > You also screwup things sometime (think the few liner you posts to l-k > > after your cleanups). Those are minor bugs, so I'm not going to panic > > Certainly. > > > on them (ramdisk works not by luck), this is what I meant, and they will > > Sorry, it just sounded so..., well, familiar... Couldn't resist ;-) Oh, yeah. So it seems. "Resistance is futile", eh? > (BTW, Richard, _what_ political whatever could be found in that?) Gee, do I have to spell it out? Just today, I saw you complain to Rik that he'd dragged you into some issue. And now you take my name in vain regarding another issue which I'd not previously been involved in. No, not exactly the same. But I couldn't help but notice a certain parallel... Anyway, this is going nowhere. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca