From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:03:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:03:21 -0400 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:14832 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:03:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:03:38 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alexander Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 Message-ID: <20010920010338.B720@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010919225505.P720@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:17:23PM -0400 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:17:23PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > fsync_dev() is not needed for raw devices or swap. It _is_ needed for > file access. then what's the difference between raw devices and swap. And there's reason we should we avoid the fsync_dev with the raw devices and swap. I just found it an useless complication. Andrea