From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:54:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:54:33 -0400 Received: from mail.ask.ne.jp ([203.179.96.3]:42984 "EHLO mail.ask.ne.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:54:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:55:47 +0900 From: Bruce Harada To: Duncan Sands Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: min/max and all that jazz Message-Id: <20010920035547.7943346b.bruce@ask.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20010919115917.A12129@maclaurence.math.u-psud.fr> In-Reply-To: <20010919115917.A12129@maclaurence.math.u-psud.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.2 (GTK+ 1.2.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: $qrUU,Lz=B[A}i%m2Rg^Ik;~V@]$Ay)$S`wUf3:^aZ1UdLf,_;1y7_xbEh=Yv*wB0=Fv]a1hj14_qQsl[f1KX]q4IdhwmSIeP6>Ap@[e$c$G;;ObLI7?YXsq*)M'3Jp wrote: > gcc has a warning option -Wsign-compare (not turned on by -Wall): [SNIP] > This might pick up some errors of the kind the new min/max macros > are trying to catch... > > PS: please CC any comments to me, since I'm not subscribed to the list. Apparently not... During the big flamefest over min()/max(), Linus expressed a fairly clear dislike for -Wsign-compare ;)