From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:31:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:31:21 -0400 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:1526 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:31:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:31:36 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alexander Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 Message-ID: <20010921003136.H729@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010921001305.F729@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:20:39PM -0400 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:20:39PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > OK. Could you resend your patch (or just the page initialization parts > of it)? I'm getting to the point where I'll start seriously touching > rd.c, so... Of course, however if you want I can first fix initrd (I was just looking into it in the last minutes), the security fix broke initrd badly unfortunately [didn't tested initrd but just the ramdisks before posting it] (not sure why initrd broke at the moment but I believe the design of the fix was the right one, so it is probably an implementation detail). So unless you need it urgently I will try to fix initrd first, then I will send to you so you can go ahead without risk of future rejects. thanks! Andrea