From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:06:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:06:26 -0400 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:46327 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:06:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 06:06:48 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alexander Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 Message-ID: <20010921060648.B729@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010921054749.Z729@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:00:35AM -0400 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:00:35AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > Well, taking a file on ramfs and doing losetup on it should be equivalent > to ramdisk. Turning relevant pieces into a driver shouldn't be too hard. > It won't be pretty, though - you'll probably want different > address_space_operations, so that read()/write() wouldn't bother with > requests at all. My same idea, agreed. Andrea