From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:29:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:29:42 -0400 Received: from vega.digitel2002.hu ([213.163.0.181]:49587 "EHLO vega.digitel2002.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:29:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:29:50 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?B?R+Fib3IgTOlu4XJ0?= To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9 Message-ID: <20010921162950.C16173@vega.digitel2002.hu> Reply-To: lgb@lgb.hu In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i X-Operating-System: vega Linux 2.4.9 i686 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:00:44PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 19 Sep 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > That added to the fact that last time someone ran the numbers linux > > was considerably faster than the BSD for mm type operations when not > > swapping. And this is the common case. > > Optimising the VM for not swapping sounds kind of like > optimising your system for doing empty fork()/exec()/exit() > loops ;) Maybe not since I'm not using swap :) The rule is (well at least it was ...) for 2.4.x desktop systems: buy 256Mb of RAM (and disable swapping at all), it's cheap ... and after that you will be able to use 2.4.x instead of 2.2.x quite well. -- --[ Gábor Lénárt ]---[ Vivendi Telecom Hungary ]---------[ lgb@lgb.hu ]-- U have 8 bit comp or chip of them and it's unused or to be sold? Call me! -------[ +36 30 2270823 ]------> LGB <-----[ Linux/UNIX/8bit 4ever ]-----