From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:34:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:34:30 -0400 Received: from cs6625129-123.austin.rr.com ([66.25.129.123]:31236 "HELO dragon.taral.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:34:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:36:57 -0500 From: Taral To: Robert Love Cc: Andrew Morton , Colin Phipps , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Message-ID: <20011022103657.B24814@taral.net> In-Reply-To: <1003562833.862.65.camel@phantasy>, <1003562833.862.65.camel@phantasy> <20011021120539.A1197@cph.demon.co.uk> <3BD2E89C.78D757A2@zip.com.au> <1003688179.1085.17.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:16:18PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > Colin, can you try Andrew's patch and report back? This problem has > been reported before -- its a tty bug that preempt (and SMP I wager) > just aggravate. I have a patch that I know fixes it, but Andrew's is > _much_ simpler. I will send you that if this fails. Please let me > know. This also looks a bit wrong: > > + if (vt) { > > + /* > > + * If we raced with con_close(), `vt' may be null. > > + * Hence this bandaid. - akpm > > + */ > > + acquire_console_sem(); > > + set_cursor(vt->vc_num); > > + release_console_sem(); > > + } Maybe should be: acquire_console_sem(); if (vt) set_cursor(vt->vc_num); release_console_sem(); ?? -- Taral This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me. "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose