From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:37:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:36:57 -0400 Received: from lsb-catv-1-p021.vtxnet.ch ([212.147.5.21]:2323 "EHLO almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:36:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:37:06 +0200 From: Werner Almesberger To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd Message-ID: <20011023223706.A8463@almesberger.net> In-Reply-To: <3BD5ABF3.1040404@usa.net> <9r4c24$g2k$1@cesium.transmeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9r4c24$g2k$1@cesium.transmeta.com>; from hpa@zytor.com on Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:14:28AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > The right thing is to get rid of the old initrd compatibility cruft, > but that's a 2.5 change. Yes, change_root is obsolete (and relies on assumptions that are no longer valid in several cases), and there has been plenty of time for distributors to switch. An early funeral in 2.5 is a good idea. - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Lausanne, CH wa@almesberger.net / /_http://icawww.epfl.ch/almesberger/_____________________________________/