From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S279958AbRKDHPr>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:15:47 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S279963AbRKDHPh>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:15:37 -0500
Received: from 10cust182.starstream.net ([63.205.212.182]:65430 "HELO
	10cust182.starstream.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S279958AbRKDHPY>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:15:24 -0500
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 23:15:03 -0800
From: Ted Deppner <ted@psyber.com>
To: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?
Message-ID: <20011103231503.A16083@dondra.ofc.psyber.com>
Reply-To: Ted Deppner <ted@psyber.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:03:17PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Would it be a Good Thing if Linus decided to make sure
> his kernels pass all of Alan's stress tests before
> releasing them?  (I'm talking e.g. 2.4.14-final, not 2.4.14-preX.)

Yes it would.  It would be a better idea if everyone (including you and
me) stress test those pre and final kernels too.

-- 
Ted Deppner
http://www.psyber.com/~ted/