From: John Summerfield <summer@os2.ami.com.au>
To: Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: DHCP broken in 2.4.x
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 21:49:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200111051349.fA5DnFD29728@numbat.os2.ami.com.au> (raw)
x in this case is 13.
As I type this my DHCP server is saying
ov 5 20:58:12 dugite dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via
eth0
Nov 5 20:58:12 dugite dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.6 to
00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via eth0
Nov 5 20:58:15 dugite dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via
eth0
Nov 5 20:58:15 dugite dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.6 to
00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via eth0
Nov 5 20:58:19 dugite dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via
eth0
Nov 5 20:58:19 dugite dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.6 to
00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via eth0
Nov 5 20:58:28 dugite dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via
eth0
Nov 5 20:58:28 dugite dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.6 to
00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via eth0
Nov 5 20:58:42 dugite dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via
eth0
Nov 5 20:58:42 dugite dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.6 to
00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via eth0
Nov 5 20:59:06 dugite dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via
eth0
Nov 5 20:59:06 dugite dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.6 to
00:c0:26:2d:be:12 via eth0
and the poor sod at the other end is
setting half-duplex ....
sending DHCP and RARP requests .... Timed out!
IPConfig: Retrying forever (NFS root).
Here's how I'm booting:
root@numbat /root]# cat /misc/fd1/syslinux.cfg
default linux
prompt 1
display boot.msg
timeout 100
label linux
kernel vmlinuz
append root=/dev/hda5
[root@numbat /root]
I'm running dhcp-2.0pl5-4 on RHL 7.1.
If I override the boot prompt:
ip=bootp
then it works.
Now I can see that I misunderstood the documentation (which, btw, could
use a minor touch-up to mention DHCP), but
but
According to the source code, ip=dchp is legit. However, it causes lots
of messages on the server just like above., and the client's looping
just like before.
Two things I'd like to see:
1) A message to the user if an invalid value's given
2) DHCP actually work. BOOTP seems fine, as far as BOOTP goes.
I have RARP genned, but there's not actually anything to talk to.
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my
disposition.
reply other threads:[~2001-11-05 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200111051349.fA5DnFD29728@numbat.os2.ami.com.au \
--to=summer@os2.ami.com.au \
--cc=Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).