From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:12:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:12:21 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([216.36.33.161]:8903 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:12:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 20:10:53 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] bootmem for 2.5 Message-ID: <20011105201053.E26577@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011102140207.V31822@w-wli.des.beaverton.ibm.com> <1005017025.897.0.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <1005017025.897.0.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:45PM -0500 Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:45PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > The patch is without problem on 2.4.13-ac7. Free memory increased by > about 100K: free and dmesg both confirm 384292k vs 384196k. This is a > P3-733 on an i815 with 384MB. Very nice. > Note that the patch and UP-APIC do not get along. Some quick debugging > with William found the cause. APIC does indeed touch bootmem. The > above is thus obviously with CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC unset. Thank you very much for testing the patch! And doubly so for uncovering this deficiency, which I will work to correct in short order as soon as I can get to some UP APIC machines (tomorrow). It looks like things may be going wrong around line 675 of apic.c, though I can't say more for sure at the moment. Thanks, Bill ----------------- willir@us.ibm.com