From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S280638AbRKFWeI>; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:34:08 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S280645AbRKFWd7>; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:33:59 -0500
Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de ([62.52.24.140]:29971 "EHLO dvmwest.gt.owl.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S280638AbRKFWdv>;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:33:51 -0500
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:33:49 +0100
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc
Message-ID: <20011106233349.A26236@lug-owl.de>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <slrn9ugh1g.dld.spamtrap@dexter.hensema.xs4all.nl> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111061921240.27028-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.5 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>:
> On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > PROCESSOR=0
> > VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
> > CPU_FAMILY=6
> > MODEL=6
> > MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"
> > .....

PROCESSOR=1
...

> > . /proc/cpuinfo
> 
> I think we have a winner!  If we could establish this 
> as policy that would be _sweet_!

What do you expect on a SMP system?

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481