From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:12:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:12:08 -0500 Received: from cx518206-a.irvn1.occa.home.com ([24.21.107.122]:34551 "HELO pobox.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:11:51 -0500 Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device To: troy@holstein.com Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:12:04 -0800 (PST) Cc: mhaque@haque.net, rml@tech9.net, mfedyk@matchmail.com, jimmy@mtc.dhs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: barryn@pobox.com In-Reply-To: from "Todd M. Roy" at Nov 07, 2001 07:13:07 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20011107151204.7E53389816@pobox.com> From: barryn@pobox.com (Barry K. Nathan) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > When I did, and used a looped an iso image, eventually my > computer froze up. Using the actual cd, it did not. So my > personal answer would be no. Hmmm... my *root* filesystem (with /usr, /home, etc. all on it) on one of my computers is loop mounted, and I've not had such a freeze with 2.4.14 and the two lines removed... Just another data point. -Barry K. Nathan