From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:49:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:49:43 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:26521 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:49:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:49:25 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20011128.144925.94842859.davem@redhat.com> To: groudier@free.fr Cc: matthias@winterdrache.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sym53c875: reading /proc causes SCSI parity error From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20011128203718.L2777-100000@gerard> In-Reply-To: <20011128.131503.22504634.davem@redhat.com> <20011128203718.L2777-100000@gerard> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Gérard Roudier Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:51:01 +0100 (CET) On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Why not just put some bitmap pointer into the pci device > struct. If it is non-NULL, it specifies PCI config space > areas which have side-effects. Or a simple offset beyond which reading data isn't desirable for whatever reasons. I do not think that is sufficient. I have seen chips where only one single PCI config space word would trigger problems, and it was due to a hw bug. The "offset beyond" scheme would not allow to cover this case.