From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:42:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:41:52 -0500 Received: from dns.logatique.fr ([213.41.101.1]:14837 "HELO persephone.dmz.logatique.fr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:41:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Thomas Capricelli Organization: KDE To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:41:44 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.6] In-Reply-To: <20011213160007.D998D23CCB@persephone.dmz.logatique.fr> <066801c183f2$53f90ec0$5601010a@prefect> In-Reply-To: <066801c183f2$53f90ec0$5601010a@prefect> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20011213163912.5741223CCD@persephone.dmz.logatique.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the patch. I've thought about doing that, but it seemed to me it was something so much important that it would already be in some official kernel. Does it mean that NONE of the existing embedded linux is able to use a ROM directly as a filesystem ?? (either root fs or not) I'm astonished. Is there some embedded-specific mailing list I'm not aware of? Thanx, Thomas On Thursday 13 December 2001 17:22, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote: > I have maintained, on and off, a patch to crafms that supports traditional > cramfs decompress-and-read/run-from-RAM, plus direct mmaping with no > decompression and read/run straight out of ROM: > > http://www.ltc.com/~brad/mips/cramfs-linear-root-xip-linux-2.4.9-2.diff > > I'm looking for a way to put a filesystem into ROM. > > Seems pretty trivial, isn't it ? > > > > My understanding is (the way initrd does, and the way I do as of today) > > * create a RAMDISK > > * loads the data into ramdisk > > * mount the ramdisk > > > > problem is that I don't want to waste the RAM as the data in the ROM is > > already in the address space. (it's an embedded system, btw) > > > > Speed is not an issue here. ROM access might be slower than RAM, it will > > always be so much quicker than a disk access. (wrong?) > > > > Ideally, i would give address/length of the fs in ROM to a function, and > > I would get a ramdisk configured to read its data exactly there, and not > > in ram. > > > > Any hint ? > > > > I've tried to look in the different options from mainstream kernels and > > embedded-oriented kernels whithout success.