From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:41:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:41:12 -0500 Received: from [213.140.14.138] ([213.140.14.138]:28050 "HELO markolaptop.markoer.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:40:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 23:40:45 +0100 From: Marco Ermini To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] DRM OS Message-Id: <20011220234045.34089a2b.markoer@markoer.org> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20011218121034.B23308@vitelus.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:44:41 -0200 (BRST) Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 09:05:55PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Remember DMCA ? Remember SSSCA ? > > > > I watch DVD's with DeCSS. Come and get me. > > Punishable by fines of up to $500,000 and 5 years > in prison, per violation. But not in Europe. Only in the USA. Algorithms may not be subjected to patents in Europe (by now). Anyway, maybe you may not get catched in the intimacy of your room. But I could understand that it's not acceptable as a legitimate proposal for a worldwide used OS, as Linux is, to suggest to every single user to violate the law in the intimacy of their room to be able to use it. I may feel safe in my own room and I may use these tools if I'm able to, but I can't propose to anyone to use these such tools, that's the point. bye -- Marco Ermini http://www.markoer.org Perche' perdere tempo ad imparare quando l'ignoranza e' istantanea? (Hobbes)