From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 14:14:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 14:14:50 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:58529 "HELO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 14:14:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 14:14:41 -0500 From: Legacy Fishtank To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Colonel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20011225141441.A14941@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <002001c18d5f$98cb62c0$010411ac@local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <002001c18d5f$98cb62c0$010411ac@local>; from manfred@colorfullife.com on Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 05:17:01PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 05:17:01PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > When I went to build 2.4.17 on a dinky box (486, 16M RAM), the > > config option was missing. The box is a wall mount and is not very > > capable of multiple kernel experimentation alas. Can someone > > supply some background as to what has happened? > > It seems that RTNETLINK is now unconditionally enabled, I don't know > why. It's required by newer RedHat and MDK initscripts, perhaps others. ip, iproute and similar utilities use it, and so since it's commonly required DaveM made it unconditional... I think the checkin comment was something along the lines of "make it unconditional unless Alan complains about kernel bloat" :) Jeff