From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:18:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:17:52 -0500 Received: from pcp809261pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net ([68.49.81.201]:6274 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:17:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:11:56 -0500 From: Olivier Galibert To: Alexander Viro Cc: Xavier Bestel , timothy.covell@ashavan.org, Robert Love , Oliver Xymoron , "Richard B. Johnson" , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel Message-ID: <20020125111156.A2871@zalem.nrockv01.md.comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Galibert , Alexander Viro , Xavier Bestel , timothy.covell@ashavan.org, Robert Love , Oliver Xymoron , "Richard B. Johnson" , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1011914865.2636.16.camel@bip> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 01:13:21AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 01:13:21AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > BTW, he's got a funny compiler - I would expect at least a warning about > use of uninitialized variable. That would require -O. Control path analysis is not done when not optimizing. OG.