From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:29:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:29:13 -0500 Received: from CPE00a024ce35e9.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.43.233.137]:3332 "EHLO 3\(NXDOMAIN\)") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:29:04 -0500 Message-Id: <200203040330.g243URr05337@3 (NXDOMAIN) > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Mark Richards To: barryn@pobox.com (Barry K. Nathan), tmolina@cox.net (Thomas Molina) Subject: Re: Invalid @home email addresses Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:30:26 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020304002030.7348089C87@cx518206-b.irvn1.occa.home.com> In-Reply-To: <20020304002030.7348089C87@cx518206-b.irvn1.occa.home.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On March 3, 2002 07:20 pm, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > Thomas Molina wrote: > > Most addresses for home.com users simply switched to cox.net addresses. > > Uh, no. I think (but am not sure) that more @home.com addresses became > @attbi.com than @cox.net. Even if I'm wrong about that, I'm almost certain > that more became @attbi.com + @rogers.ca + @shaw.ca + @charterpipeline.com > + @comcast.net + ... than @cox.net. (It's possible that I made errors in > the past sentence, perhaps confusing .com and .net stuff or the like, but > even in the face of such errors I think my point still stands.) FYI it's @rogers.com not @rogers.ca, if anyone cares. > > > However, email to the above users at cox.net bounced in four out of five > > cases. > > I wouldn't be surprised if four out of five weren't with Cox in the first > place. > > -Barry K. Nathan Mark