linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
To: Guest section DW <dwguest@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	rajancr@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 18:14:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020307231307.D54F13FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020305145004.BFA503FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020307190635.9DE533FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020307194602.GA13092@win.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20020307194602.GA13092@win.tue.nl>

On Thursday 07 March 2002 02:46 pm, Guest section DW wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:07:38PM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 March 2002 09:54 am, Guest section DW wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:35:09AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Long ago I submitted a patch that changed the max pid from 15 bits to
> > > 24 or 30 bits or so. (And of course removed the inefficiency noticed
> > > by some people in the current thread.)
> >
> > I don't think that will solve the N^2 problem
>
> Do you understand "inefficiency"? And "remove"?


I do, what's your point ?
I haven't seen your patch picked up....

I do understand that when you occasionally get into this scenario
of the loop that particularly for large thread counts this stalls the system
for seconds (say 30, with the tasklock held).


-- 
-- Hubertus Franke  (frankeh@watson.ibm.com)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-07 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-05  1:57 Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 16:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 16:43   ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07  3:56 ` Rusty Russell
2002-03-07 14:35   ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 14:54     ` Guest section DW
2002-03-07 19:07       ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 19:44         ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-07 19:46         ` Guest section DW
2002-03-07 23:14           ` Hubertus Franke [this message]
2002-03-07 15:21   ` Dave McCracken
2002-03-05 16:43 Rajan Ravindran
2002-03-05 17:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 19:53   ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 20:10     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 21:59       ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 22:48         ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 23:40           ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 22:37 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020307231307.D54F13FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwguest@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rajancr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).