From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:47:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:47:14 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:46084 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:47:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:46:54 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Oleg Drokin Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: kernel nfs between 2.4.19-pre2 (server) and 2.2.21-pre3 (client) Message-Id: <20020311114654.2901890f.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20020311091458.A24600@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <200203110018.BAA11921@webserver.ithnet.com> <15499.64058.442959.241470@charged.uio.no> <20020311091458.A24600@namesys.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:14:58 +0300 Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:28:42AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > this is a weak try of an explanation. All involved fs types are > > > reiserfs. The problem occurs reproducably only after (and > > Which ReiserFS format? Is it version 3.5? > > > 'cat /proc/fs/reiserfs/device/version' > > If this does not work because you have no such file, then look through your > kernel logs, if you use reiserfs v3.5 on 2.4 kernel, it will show itself > as such record in the log file: "reiserfs: using 3.5.x disk format" Hello Oleg, hello Trond, hello Alan, I have several reiserfs fs in use on this server. boot.msg looks like <4>reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 08:03) ... <4>Using r5 hash to sort names <4>ReiserFS version 3.6.25 <4>VFS: Mounted root (reiserfs filesystem) readonly. <4>Freeing unused kernel memory: 224k freed <6>Adding Swap: 265032k swap-space (priority 42) <4>reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 21:01) ... <4>Using r5 hash to sort names <4>ReiserFS version 3.6.25 <4>reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 22:01) ... <4>Using tea hash to sort names <4>reiserfs: using 3.5.x disk format <4>ReiserFS version 3.6.25 <4>reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 08:04) ... <4>Using r5 hash to sort names <4>ReiserFS version 3.6.25 I tried to find out which device has which numbers and did a cat /proc/devices: Block devices: 2 fd 8 sd 11 sr 22 ide1 33 ide2 34 ide3 65 sd 66 sd Interestingly there is no #21. Shouldn't I see a block device 21 here? More strange the only two existing ide-drives in this system are located on ide2 and ide3 and should therefore have device numbers 33 and 34, or not? There is no hd on ide1, only a CDROM (not used during the test). ide0 is completely empty. As told earlier this is kernel 2.4.19-pre2. Enlighten me, please... Stephan