From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:47:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:47:35 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:4356 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:47:30 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:47:17 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Oleg Drokin Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: kernel nfs between 2.4.19-pre2 (server) and 2.2.21-pre3 (client) Message-Id: <20020311134717.65fafb85.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20020311141154.C856@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <200203110018.BAA11921@webserver.ithnet.com> <15499.64058.442959.241470@charged.uio.no> <20020311091458.A24600@namesys.com> <20020311114654.2901890f.skraw@ithnet.com> <20020311135256.A856@namesys.com> <20020311141154.C856@namesys.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:11:54 +0300 Oleg Drokin wrote: > So that's /dev/hdg1 that is reiserfs v3.5 > > > /dev/hdg1 20043416 16419444 3623972 82% /p3 > > Exported fs is on /dev/hde1. > > Hm. Strange. Are you sure you do not export /dev/hdg1? Ok, Oleg, I re-checked the setup with all server fs as reiserfs 3.6 and the problem stays the same. Mar 11 13:05:07 admin kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 22:01) ... Mar 11 13:05:09 admin kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names Mar 11 13:05:09 admin kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.25 What else can I try? I checked the setup with another client kernel 2.4.18, and guess what: it has the same problem. I have the impression that the problem is somewhere on the nfs server side - possibly around the umount case. Trond, Ken? Can anyone reproduce this? It should be fairly simple to check. Regards, Stephan