From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:54:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:54:09 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:657 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:53:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:53:56 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 7.52 second kernel compile Message-ID: <20020326185356.B19912@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org For the record, Alpha timings: pca164 @ 533MHz: 72.79: 19 1.50: 20 21.30: 35 1.50: 36 1.30: 105 ev6 @ 500MHz: 2.43: 78 72.13: 84 2.55: 89 5.87: 90 1.38: 105 5.94: 108 1.36: 112 I wonder how much of that ev6 slowdown is due to an SRM that's has to handle both 3 and 4 level page tables, and how much is due to the more expensive syncing of the OOO pipeline... r~