From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:07:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:07:12 -0400 Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:28063 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:07:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:07:10 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Urban Widmark Cc: "Ivan G." , Shing Chuang , LKML , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Via-rhine minor issues Message-ID: <20020421120710.H2301@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <02042101022001.00833@cobra.linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:19:40PM +0200, Urban Widmark wrote: > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Ivan G. wrote: > > > DIFF-ED AGAINST: > > 2.4.19-pre3 ( I don't think there were changes to via-rhine > > b-ween pre3 and pre7) > > You should probably send this to Jeff Garzik instead of Marcelo. Jeff > collects net driver patches. > > If you don't, Shing Chuang's changes are in -pre7-ac2, so a re-diff vs > that and seding it to Alan Cox may cause less merge work. Does Ivan's patch look ok to you, Urban? I'd like to get your initial sign-off on it. From a quick look, it looks ok to me. And yes, you are correct: my preference would be to receive two submissions in my inbox: Shing Chuang's patch, and then Ivan's patch (less Shing's work). If there are multiple issues, multiple patches are encouraged. More split-up is always better than less. :) Regards, Jeff