From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S311834AbSECNQl>; Fri, 3 May 2002 09:16:41 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S311871AbSECNQk>; Fri, 3 May 2002 09:16:40 -0400
Received: from paloma14.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.14]:17548 "HELO
	paloma14.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S311834AbSECNQk>; Fri, 3 May 2002 09:16:40 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Organization: DN
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19-pre8
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 15:16:29 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
        Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200205031516.29892.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Sorry for my ignorance Marcelo,

but why don't we see the "outstanding" VM fixes even if the -19 cycle is so 
long, then?

So we see posts like "...hurray, the O(1)-scheduler is so much faster..." and 
"...-jam6, too..." (including the spiltted vm33), etc.

All this numbers are known for months.

Do you think the pending VM stuff goes into -20, at least?

Thanks,
	Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de