From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 14:14:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 14:14:19 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:55300 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 14:14:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 19:11:18 +0100 From: Russell King To: Linus Torvalds Cc: george anzinger , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 Message-ID: <20020511191118.F1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <3CDD5570.E7E97205@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:37:39AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 11 May 2002, george anzinger wrote: > > > > So, what to do? For ARM and MIPS we could go back to solution 1: > > Why not just put that knowledge in the ARM/MIPS architecture makefile? > > ARM already has multiple linker scripts, and it already selects on them > based on CONFIG options, so I'd much rather just do that straightforward > kind of thing than play any clever games. So would I - there will be a config option, so we can just use sed on the relevant linker script to do the right thing. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html