From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 16:31:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 16:31:07 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:64779 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 16:31:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 21:31:03 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org Message-ID: <20020512203103.GA9087@gallifrey> In-Reply-To: <20020512010709.7a973fac.spyro@armlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18 (i686) X-Uptime: 21:27:53 up 1 day, 22:21, 3 users, load average: 2.04, 2.04, 2.00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com) wrote: > > What are peoples opinion about the "full" changelog format that v2.5.x > kernels have? Should we sort that too by author? I used to read the hand written changelogs, they only used to be a half page or so; neatly summerising stuff into one line; I can't be bothered with the full changelogs - they are obviously useful; but the hand written half pages are still a lot easier at a quick glance to see if there is anything that affects you. Perhaps insisting that each check in message includes a single line (sub 60 chars) description; could turn those into description : name and remove dupes? Dave ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/