From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 08:52:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 08:52:42 -0400 Received: from mail.medav.de ([213.95.12.190]:61455 "HELO mail.medav.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 14 May 2002 08:52:42 -0400 From: "Daniela Engert" To: "Martin Dalecki" , "Neil Conway" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:52:29 +0200 (CDT) Reply-To: "Daniela Engert" X-Mailer: PMMail 2.00.1500 for OS/2 Warp 4.05 In-Reply-To: <3CE0D952.7080403@evision-ventures.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.15 IDE 61 Message-Id: <20020514114455.D4CE26FC1@mail.medav.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:30:58 +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: >There is no problem to go in paralell on different channels for >requests. The serialization has only to be done >for the drive setup. This assumption is *not* valid in all cases! For example, get dtips10.pdf from the CMD website and learn how the CMD646 may fail on concurrent requests on both channels. There are other chips which need runtime serialization. Ciao, Dani ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Daniela Engert, systems engineer at MEDAV GmbH Gräfenberger Str. 34, 91080 Uttenreuth, Germany Phone ++49-9131-583-348, Fax ++49-9131-583-11