From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:59:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:59:36 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:38113 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:59:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:59:35 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: Larry McVoy , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org Message-ID: <20020515155935.K13795@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Kai Germaschewski , Larry McVoy , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20020515153016.H13795@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:56:18PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > bk park # saves work as a patch > > bk pull > > bk unpark # restores the patch > > > > park/unpark are undocumented because they puke when there are patch rejects. > > If we document them, then we have to explain to people what to do when there > > are patch rejects, and if you need that explanation, we probably can't help > > you. You guys all grok patch rejects, so try park/unpark. > > So what's the undocumented option to turn off consistency checks? ;-) > > I understand that they exist for a reason, etc, but I'd really like to > have the option to switch them off (and suffer the consequences all by > myself) We've got a release in the works which makes it so you can run them only once in a 24 hour period. I'm fixing up the stuff that caused the problems on multiple patch imports and then we'll do a release. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm