From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:21:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:21:19 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:58606 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:21:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 23:21:09 +0200 From: "J.A. Magallon" To: Anton Blanchard Cc: Dipankar Sarma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Dave Miller Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] TIMER_BH-less smptimers Message-ID: <20020520212109.GA5821@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20020516185448.A8069@in.ibm.com> <20020520085500.GB14488@krispykreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Balsa 1.3.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002.05.20 Anton Blanchard wrote: > >Hi Dipankar, > >> I have been experimenting with Ingo's smptimers and I ended up >> extending it a little bit. I would really appreciate comments >> on whether these things make sense or not. > >I tried it out and found that we were context switching like crazy. >It seems we were always running the timers out of a tasklet because >we never unlocked the net_bh_lock. > The patch for 2.4 in http://people.redhat.com/mingo/scalable-timers-patches/ does not acquire net_bh_lock. Then I suppose it does not apply to that ? So this patch is a little outdated wrt the one for 2.5. Is there any updated version available for 2.4 ? Can I try your patch for 2.5 on 2.4 or is there any infrastructure missing ? TIA -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam3 #1 SMP dom may 19 21:07:40 CEST 2002 i686