From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 May 2002 14:44:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 May 2002 14:44:08 -0400 Received: from mark.mielke.cc ([216.209.85.42]:46341 "EHLO mark.mielke.cc") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 May 2002 14:44:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 14:38:34 -0400 From: Mark Mielke To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Kurt Wall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)] Message-ID: <20020525143834.B4481@mark.mielke.cc> In-Reply-To: <20020524223950.D22643@work.bitmover.com> <20020525091444.H28795@work.bitmover.com> <3CEFB9C6.FC21D7CB@opersys.com> <20020525134709.L405@marta> <3CEFD8CE.37B28513@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:32:46PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > February 2001: > http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT2094189920.html > He ends his article with the following: > "It seems to me, RTLinux is a fine system with great potential when thought > of as an open-source project. I'm not sure it will fare as well when looked > at as a commercial RTOS." This looks exactly like a party line to me. In fact, the same statement could be made by the FSF for every single application that currently exists. Would they be right? We each draw our own conclusions. mark -- mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them... http://mark.mielke.cc/