linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Paratimer@aol.com
Cc: rddunlap@osdl.org, lm@bitmover.com, erwin@muffin.org,
	yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rtai@rtai.org
Subject: Re: RTAI/RtLinux
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:18:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020527151853.212DA11973@denx.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 May 2002 10:37:47 EDT." <a0.2767541f.2a239ebb@aol.com>

In message <a0.2767541f.2a239ebb@aol.com> Joachim Martillo wrote:
> 
> Did I say anything about limited resources?  In any case, I have been
> building and designing embedded and turnkey systems for 20 years.
> I would be extremely dubious of any design that passed by my
> desk that proposed the use of a general purpose multiuser,
> multiprocessing, time sliced, preemptive, multimode, virtual
> memory operating system for a digital video recorder.

So what do you recommend when  the  requirement  specification  lists
features as
- Web interface (interface to electronic program guide database)
- network interface (up- / download to normal PC over ethernet)
- IEEE1384 interface (for digital cameras)
- USB interface (for keyboard, printer)
...

Would you start from scratch, or buy component by component, or  just
use Linux?

> > Again, this is not quite  correct.  There  have  been  Real-Time  and
> > Embedded  Unix  systems  before  (LynxOS, to name one). And there are
> > other "common proprietary operating systems" that can be adapted  for
> > embedded needs (WinCE).
> 
> And is there anything that can be done with WinCE or the various
> RT/unix knock-off's that cannot be done better without?

Please let me keep my mouth shut about WinCE.

But yes, there are situations where "the various RT/unix knock-off's"
are the optimal solution (fastest time to market, lowest  cost,  most
features, highest reliability).

> Excuse me, but we are talking embedded systems.  At some
> point there will be copyrighted tradesecreted or patented programs
> in the system.

Maybe. As application. So what?  That  does  not  mean  that  the  OS
kernel, device drivers etc. may not be available under GPL.

> > The problems with Linux  in  Embedded  and  especially  in  Real-Time
> > Systems  are not technical ones. It is the political situation, where
> > the user is left in uncertainty about what he can legally do and what
> > not.
> 
> Easy enough to deal with.  One generates an appropriate real time
> embedded turnkey operating system customized for the embedded 
> turnkey application.  In my experience, it takes about 4-6 weeks
> without disk management and perhaps 8-12 with disk management.

I see. Yes, there are problems of that class. But that's not what I'm
talking about.

> And then one does not have to deal with multimegabytes of
> non-locally produced code that is just lying in wait to cause
> problems.

??? What are you talking about?

> You may need to learn more about doing business in the USA.

Definitely. I learn a lot each day.

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?

       reply	other threads:[~2002-05-27 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a0.2767541f.2a239ebb@aol.com>
2002-05-27 15:18 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
     [not found] <57.c083d0f.2a237c49@aol.com>
2002-05-27 12:36 ` RTAI/RtLinux Wolfgang Denk
2002-05-25  9:05 RTAI/RtLinux Erwin Rol
2002-05-25  9:16 ` RTAI/RtLinux Erwin Rol
2002-05-25 13:30 ` RTAI/RtLinux Alan Cox
2002-05-25 13:42   ` RTAI/RtLinux Erwin Rol
2002-05-25 13:21     ` RTAI/RtLinux Der Herr Hofrat
2002-05-25 15:08       ` RTAI/RtLinux Erwin Rol
2002-05-25 16:05 ` RTAI/RtLinux Larry McVoy
2002-05-25 16:28   ` RTAI/RtLinux Karim Yaghmour
2002-05-25 16:30   ` RTAI/RtLinux Erwin Rol
2002-05-25 17:31   ` RTAI/RtLinux Randy.Dunlap
2002-05-25 17:40     ` RTAI/RtLinux Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
2002-05-25 18:04       ` RTAI/RtLinux Randy.Dunlap
2002-05-25 17:42     ` RTAI/RtLinux Wolfgang Denk
2002-05-26  4:03   ` RTAI/RtLinux Kevin O'Connor
2002-05-26  4:17     ` RTAI/RtLinux Alexander Viro
2002-05-26  4:18     ` RTAI/RtLinux Larry McVoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020527151853.212DA11973@denx.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=Paratimer@aol.com \
    --cc=erwin@muffin.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=rtai@rtai.org \
    --cc=yodaiken@fsmlabs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).