From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 06:30:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 06:30:11 -0400 Received: from [62.70.58.70] ([62.70.58.70]:26305 "EHLO mail.pronto.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 30 May 2002 06:30:10 -0400 Message-Id: <200205301029.g4UATuE03249@mail.pronto.tv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Organization: Pronto TV AS To: Andrew Morton , "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:29:55 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200205241004.g4OA4Ul28364@mail.pronto.tv> <1572079531.1022225730@[10.10.2.3]> <3CEE954F.9CB99816@zip.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I don't think Andrew is ready to submit this yet ... before anything > > gets merged back, it'd be very worthwhile testing the relative > > performance of both solutions ... the more testers we have the > > better ;-) > > Cripes no. It's pretty experimental. Andrea spotted a bug, too. Fixed > version is below. Works great! This should _definetely_ be merged into the main kernel after som testing. Without it _all_ other kernels I've tested (2.4.lots) goes OOM under the mentioned scenarios. This one simply does the job. > It's possible that keeping the number of buffers as low as possible > will give improved performance over Andrea's approach because it > leaves more ZONE_NORMAL for other things. It's also possible that > it'll give worse performance because more get_block's need to be > done for file overwriting. Andrea's patch merely pushed the problem forward. This one fixed it -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.