linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre8aa3
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 22:34:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020531203454.GQ1172@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020515212733.GA1025@dualathlon.random> <20020516202626.A13795@infradead.org>

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:26:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:27:33PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > o	minor bdflush tuning difference to avoid char-writer in bonnie
> > 	to stall and to slowdown too much (can make a difference in real
> > 	life)
> 
> ...
> 
> > Only in 2.4.19pre8aa3: 00_bdflush-tuning-1
> > 
> > 	Put the mid watermark at 50% (near the high watermark so we don't stall
> > 	too much).
> 
> As the 2.4.19-pre mainline got your buffer throtteling changes I guess it
> has the same issues?  Do you think it's worth to submit that patch to Marcelo
> even that late in the release cycle?

it is not very important, but of course it could go in too.

> 
> > Only in 2.4.19pre8aa2: 05_vm_10_read_write_tweaks-1
> > Only in 2.4.19pre8aa3: 05_vm_10_read_write_tweaks-2
> > 
> > 	Avoid backing out the flush_page_to_ram in this vm patch,
> > 	the one on the pagecache is still needed before the memcpy
> > 	on the pagecache during the early cow (would be cleaner
> > 	to move it up, if Hugh wants to clean it up that's welcome,
> > 	it will be an orthogonal patch, so far I just avoid to
> > 	change that area in my changes, not high prio to clean it up
> > 	as DaveM side it's more high prio to conver the users of
> > 	flush_page_to_ram API to flush_dcache_page/icache new API during 2.5).
> 
> It seems to me you ignore the comments akpm put in the split patches you
> merged :)  Not only the comment to this change is superflous now, but also

updated :)

> I'd really like to get an answer to the remaining part of it as Andrew's
> comment about that part beeing buggy makes a lot of sense to me..

well, as Andrew said it's a microoptimization, but it's not buggy. It is
used to avoid marking a page referenced twice if somebody reads with an
userspace buffer granularity smaller than PAGE_SIZE, the same
optimization exists in the read side (there it is a bit more of a
microoptimization because the writer never activates pages but the
readers activates pages without such check).

Andrea

      reply	other threads:[~2002-05-31 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-15 21:27 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-15 21:56 ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andreas Dilger
2002-05-16  2:18   ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-15 22:30 ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Rik van Riel
2002-05-16  2:01   ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16  2:06     ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Rik van Riel
2002-05-16  2:32       ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16  2:42         ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Rik van Riel
2002-05-16  2:58           ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16  8:36         ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Russell King
2002-05-16  8:59           ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Russell King
2002-05-16 12:56           ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16  9:27         ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Juan Quintela
2002-05-16 16:07           ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16 18:37             ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Rik van Riel
2002-05-16 18:59               ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16  3:12     ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrew Morton
2002-05-16  3:23       ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-16 19:26 ` 2.4.19pre8aa3 Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-31 20:34   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020531203454.GQ1172@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).