From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 06:23:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 06:23:53 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:56081 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 06:23:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:23:53 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Helge Hafting Cc: Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler hints Message-ID: <20020605122353.G5277@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Helge Hafting , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1023206034.912.89.camel@sinai> <3CFDC796.C05FC7E2@aitel.hist.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > The problem is that this may be abused. Someone nasty could > write a cpu hog that drops a lot of hints about being > interactive, starving real interactive programs. > > Generally, it degenerates into application programmers > using _all_ the hints to get performance, so they > can beat some competitor in benchmarks. And all > other programs just get penalized. I can see how that would be a problem. If I didn't have the source to $programs. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs