From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:26:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:26:50 -0400 Received: from [62.70.58.70] ([62.70.58.70]:21123 "EHLO mail.pronto.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:26:49 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Organization: ProntoTV AS To: Andrew Morton , "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:26:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200205241004.g4OA4Ul28364@mail.pronto.tv> <1572079531.1022225730@[10.10.2.3]> <3CEE954F.9CB99816@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3CEE954F.9CB99816@zip.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200206181326.27860.roy@karlsbakk.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Any plans to merge this into the main kernel, giving a choice > > > (in config or /proc) to enable this? > > > > I don't think Andrew is ready to submit this yet ... before anything > > gets merged back, it'd be very worthwhile testing the relative > > performance of both solutions ... the more testers we have the > > better ;-) > > Cripes no. It's pretty experimental. Andrea spotted a bug, too. Fixed > version is below. Any more plans? The patch has been working great for some time now, and I'd really like to see this in the official tree. Also - I guess this patch will eliminate any caching whatsoever, and therefore not really a good thing for file or web servers? roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.